Reckless Endangerment

What is Reckless Endangerment?

According to RCW §9A.36.050, a person is guilty of reckless endangerment if he recklessly engages in conduct not amounting to a drive-by shooting but that creates a substantial risk of death or serious physical injury to another person.

The legal term "reckless" means that the actor was aware of, but consciously disregarded, a substantial and unjustifiable risk.

Penalties for Reckless Endangerment in Washington:

Reckless endangerment is considered as a gross misdemeanor, which RCW §9A.20.021 defines as punishable by up to one year in jail, a maximum fine of $5,000, or both.

Reckless Endangerment and DUIs:

Reckless endangerment is a lesser charge than a DUI in Washington. In some cases, a criminal defense attorney may be able to get prosecutors to reduce a DUI charge to a reckless endangerment charge. Unlike a DUI, a reckless endangerment conviction does not carry mandatory jail time, fines or the installment of an ignition interlock device on your vehicle. If you are later charged with another DUI, however, the reckless endangerment charge will be considered a prior offense.

Defending a Reckless Endangerment Charge:

There may be a number of ways to defend a reckless endangerment charge. As defined above, a "reckless" act requires that the actor is aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk that his conduct will place another person in imminent danger of death or serious bodily harm. Therefore, one possible defense may be that you were not aware that your conduct posed such a substantial and unjustifiable risk. Your defense strategy is crucial, and the help of a skilled criminal defense attorney is strongly advised.

Client Reviews
Mark C. Blair has no rival in his field in Seattle. A consummate professional. Communication was brief, straightforward, easy to understand, and without a typical condescending tone you can sometimes experience from attorneys on top of their field. Correspondence was timely and always affective. Any in need of criminal defense, should have a conversation with Mr. Blair, and you will quickly see and feel, no further contacts, referrals, or phone calls need be made. The money and time that can be saved by streamlining future contact and collateral damage in the sentencing process will far and away be worth every penny of the fee structure. Thank you very very much Mark Blair. N.Mark French
Sara Kim of BlairKim is a great attorney. I had never before had representation or dealt with the legal system and she made it very easy for me. She converted the legalese into laymans terms for me and helped me to understand the steps of the process. When I hesitated on certain decisions, Sara gave me the confidence and encouragement to proceed – especially since it was most beneficial to me in the long run. Sara is very straightforward and professional while also being personable and pleasant to deal with. Tamara
Sara Kim was the perfect lawyer for our situation. We were determined not to involve the courts in our divorce. Within the first 30 minutes of consultation, Sara proposed an equitable formula for division of property which we used to negotiate an agreement that felt fair to both of us. Our flat fee arrangement with Sara covered the filing of paperwork which alleviated much pressure for us during a very stressful time. I highly recommend Sara for her flexibility, professionalism, and efficiency. Carrie