COVID-19 Notice: We Remain Here For You. Learn More.

Identity Theft

What is Identity Theft?

The crime of identity theft falls under the category of "theft." According to RCW §9.35.020, identity theft is defined as knowingly obtaining, possessing, using, or transferring a means of identification or financial information of another person, living or dead, with the intent to commit, or to aid or abet, any crime.

A few examples of the types of identification or financial information that are commonly involved in identity theft offenses include names, addresses, driver's license information, Social Security numbers, credit card numbers and photos.

There are two types of identity theft in Washington State categorized by the amount of financial harm caused: identity theft in the first degree and identity theft in the second degree.

Identity Theft in the First Degree:

A person commits identity theft in the first degree if he commits identity theft and obtains credit, money, goods, services, or anything else of value in excess of $1,500 in value.

Penalties for Identity Theft in the First Degree in Washington:

Identity theft in the first degree is considered a class B felony, which RCW §9A.20.021 defines as punishable by up to ten years in prison, a maximum fine of $20,000, or both.

Identity Theft in the Second Degree:

A person commits identity theft in the second degree if he commits identity theft under circumstances not amounting to identity theft in the first degree (involving a loss amounting to $1,500 or less). In other words, any act of identity theft by which the offender obtains credit, money, goods, services, or anything else of value less than or equal to $1,500 in value.

Penalties for Identity Theft in the Second Degree in Washington:

Identity theft in the second degree is considered a class C felony, which RCW §9A.20.021 defines as punishable by up to five years in prison, a maximum fine of $10,000, or both.

Other Penalties for Identity Theft in Washington:

It is important to note that, according to RCW §9.35.020, a person convicted of identity theft may also be required to pay civil damages in the amount of $1,000 or in the amount of actual loss, whichever is greater, including costs to repair the victim's credit record, and reasonable attorneys' fees as determined by the court.

Defending an Identity Theft Charge:

It might be possible to show that you did not realize you possessed someone else's personal information, that you obtained the information without criminal intent, or that you were wrongfully accused and never actually had the information in the first place. Your defense strategy is crucial, and the help of a skilled criminal defense attorney is strongly advised.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
Mark C. Blair has no rival in his field in Seattle. A consummate professional. Communication was brief, straightforward, easy to understand, and without a typical condescending tone you can sometimes experience from attorneys on top of their field. Correspondence was timely and always affective. Any in need of criminal defense, should have a conversation with Mr. Blair, and you will quickly see and feel, no further contacts, referrals, or phone calls need be made. The money and time that can be saved by streamlining future contact and collateral damage in the sentencing process will far and away be worth every penny of the fee structure. Thank you very very much Mark Blair. N.Mark French
★★★★★
Sara Kim of BlairKim is a great attorney. I had never before had representation or dealt with the legal system and she made it very easy for me. She converted the legalese into laymans terms for me and helped me to understand the steps of the process. When I hesitated on certain decisions, Sara gave me the confidence and encouragement to proceed – especially since it was most beneficial to me in the long run. Sara is very straightforward and professional while also being personable and pleasant to deal with. Tamara
★★★★★
Sara Kim was the perfect lawyer for our situation. We were determined not to involve the courts in our divorce. Within the first 30 minutes of consultation, Sara proposed an equitable formula for division of property which we used to negotiate an agreement that felt fair to both of us. Our flat fee arrangement with Sara covered the filing of paperwork which alleviated much pressure for us during a very stressful time. I highly recommend Sara for her flexibility, professionalism, and efficiency. Carrie