COVID-19 Notice: We Remain Here For You. Learn More.

Possessing Stolen Property

What is Possessing Stolen Property?

According to RCW §9A.56.140, a person commits the crime of possessing stolen property when he:

  1. Knowingly receives, retains, possesses, conceals, or disposes of stolen property;
  2. Knowing that the property is stolen; and
  3. Possessed the stolen property for the purpose of withholding it from the rightful owner or setting it aside for use by anyone other than the rightful owner.

A person can commit the crime of possessing stolen property in the first degree, second degree, or third degree.

Possessing Stolen Property in the First Degree:

According to RCW §9A.56.150, a person may be charged with possessing stolen property in the first degree if a person possesses stolen property, as defined above, which exceeds $5,000 in value. This offense does not include possession of a stolen firearm or motor vehicle.

Penalties for Possessing Stolen Property in the First Degree in Washington:

Possession of stolen property in the first degree is a class B felony, which RCW §9A.20.021 defines as punishable by a maximum sentence of ten years in prison, a maximum fine of $20,000, or both.

Possessing Stolen Property in the Second Degree:

According to RCW §9A.56.160, a person may be charged with possessing stolen property in the second degree if a person possesses stolen property, as defined above, and

  1. The stolen property exceeds $750 in value, but does not exceed $5,000 (and is not a firearm or motor vehicle); or
  2. The stolen property is a public record, writing or instrument kept, filed, or deposited according law; or
  3. The stolen property is an access device.

Penalties for Possessing Stolen Property in the Second Degree in Washington:

Possession of stolen property in the second degree is a class C felony, which RCW §9A.20.021 defines as punishable by a maximum sentence of five years in prison, a maximum fine of $10,000, or both.

Possessing Stolen Property in the Third Degree:

According to RCW §9A.56.170, a person may be charged with possessing stolen property in the third degree if a person possesses stolen property, as defined above, which does not exceed $750 in value.

Penalties for Possessing Stolen Property in the Third Degree in Washington:

Possession of stolen property in the third degree is a gross misdemeanor, which RCW §9A.20.021 defines as punishable by a maximum sentence of one year in prison, a maximum fine of $5,000, or both.

Defending a Possessing Stolen Property Charge:

There are various ways to defend a charge of possessing stolen property. For example, a skilled attorney might be able to prove that you did not know the property you possessed was stolen, or that you received the property with the intention of returning it to the rightful owner. It is crucial that you organize your defense strategy as soon as possible.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
Mark C. Blair has no rival in his field in Seattle. A consummate professional. Communication was brief, straightforward, easy to understand, and without a typical condescending tone you can sometimes experience from attorneys on top of their field. Correspondence was timely and always affective. Any in need of criminal defense, should have a conversation with Mr. Blair, and you will quickly see and feel, no further contacts, referrals, or phone calls need be made. The money and time that can be saved by streamlining future contact and collateral damage in the sentencing process will far and away be worth every penny of the fee structure. Thank you very very much Mark Blair. N.Mark French
★★★★★
Sara Kim of BlairKim is a great attorney. I had never before had representation or dealt with the legal system and she made it very easy for me. She converted the legalese into laymans terms for me and helped me to understand the steps of the process. When I hesitated on certain decisions, Sara gave me the confidence and encouragement to proceed – especially since it was most beneficial to me in the long run. Sara is very straightforward and professional while also being personable and pleasant to deal with. Tamara
★★★★★
Sara Kim was the perfect lawyer for our situation. We were determined not to involve the courts in our divorce. Within the first 30 minutes of consultation, Sara proposed an equitable formula for division of property which we used to negotiate an agreement that felt fair to both of us. Our flat fee arrangement with Sara covered the filing of paperwork which alleviated much pressure for us during a very stressful time. I highly recommend Sara for her flexibility, professionalism, and efficiency. Carrie