Seattle Internet Misconduct and Protection Orders
Experienced Attorneys Assisting Seattle Residents with Protection Orders
Internet misconduct can take many different forms. Sometimes it involves cyberstalking, cyber-harassment, or catfishing. It can be criminal, but in some cases, the conduct is not severe enough to be charged as a crime, even though it causes the victim significant distress. Whether you are trying to obtain a protection order based on Internet misconduct, or you are defending against accusations in a petition for a protection order in Washington, it is important to retain an experienced Seattle protection order lawyer. Blair Kim Moeller, PLLC protects your rights, freedom, and future.
Protection Orders Related to Internet Misconduct
It is possible for a victim of online harassment or other Internet misconduct to obtain a civil anti-harassment protection order. There are also various other protection orders available depending on the situation, including domestic violence protection orders, sexual assault protection orders, no-contact orders, and restraining orders. A civil anti-harassment order can be obtained when the person seeking the order has been significantly harassed, alarmed, or annoyed by a course of conduct that does not serve a legitimate purpose and would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress. The parties usually are not married or former cohabitants and do not have kids together.
When determining whether there was a legitimate or lawful purpose to the perpetrator’s course of conduct, the court will consider factors such as whether the contact between the parties was initiated only by the perpetrator or by both parties, whether the perpetrator was notified that further contact with the petitioner was unwanted, whether the perpetrator’s course of conduct was designed to annoy, harass, or alarm the petitioner, and whether the perpetrator was acting under any statutory authority, such as taking acts to protect liberty or property to meet certain statutory duties. The court will also look at whether the perpetrator’s course of conduct was intended to interfere with privacy or create an offensive, hostile, or intimidating living environment, and whether there are any prior court orders in place.
A petition for a civil anti-harassment protection order is supposed to allege that there has been harassment, and it should include a sworn affidavit specifying the circumstances under which the petitioner is seeking relief. This petition can be made whether or not there are criminal charges pending against the person alleged to have perpetrated harassment.
Furthermore, a parent of someone under age 18 can retain an attorney to help petition for a protection order to restrain someone 18 or older from contacting their child if the contact is detrimental to the child’s welfare. The parent can only petition to restrain another person under age 18 from contacting the child if the person to be restrained has been adjudicated of an offense against the child that is protected by the order or is being investigated for such an offense. The court is supposed to consider how severe the alleged offense is and whether there is continuing physical danger or emotional distress to the child, as well as the expense and disruption to school caused by transferring the person to be restrained to another school.
In some situations, Internet misconduct can give rise to either a civil anti-harassment order or a no-contact order as part of a criminal case. For example, a victim of cyber-stalking may report the matter to the police to investigate whether criminal charges are appropriate, or the victim may simply file for an anti-harassment order.
Under RCW 9.61.260, you can be found guilty of cyber-stalking if a prosecutor can prove that you had the intent to harass, embarrass, intimidate, or torment somebody else, and you electronically communicated to the other person or a third party by using lewd or obscene words or images, or you anonymously or repeatedly communicated with them, or you threatened to inflict an injury on the person contacted or a family or household member. The circumstances cannot be considered telephone harassment.
Stay In The Know
-
Is It Still a Protection Order Violation if Someone Else Makes the Call?
Attorney reviewed by Mark Blair, a Washington-admitted attorney who handles the firm's criminal defense matters. Last ...
- Protection Order Violations
Read Post -
Coercive Control and Protection Orders in Washington: What Asbach v. Couto Means for DVPO Petitioners
Not every form of domestic violence leaves a bruise. Washington law has recognized this for several years, and a recent ...
- Protection Order Violations
Read Post -
Washington Court Affirms Domestic Violence Protection Order: No Intent Requirement, No Detailed Findings Needed
Domestic violence protection orders can reshape every aspect of a family’s life—restricting contact with a spouse, ...
- Domestic Violence
- Protection Order Violations
Read Post
Real Stories From People We’ve Helped Protect
-
“They showed their best at all times. I would recommend and refer this firm to anyone seeking true professional legal assistance.”- Former Client
-
“If I could give Mark a higher recommendation, then I would. He deserves not 5, but 6 stars for the way he handled my case.”- Scott
-
“I was very pleased with Mark, they responded every time I had any concerns, kept me informed throughout the whole process.”- Alex
