Seattle Prosecuting or Suing for Internet Misconduct
Civil Protection Order Lawyers Assisting Seattle Residents
Internet misconduct takes many different forms in the state of Washington, including cyber-harassment, cat-fishing, and cyber-stalking. Some people who engage in these behaviors do not realize that their presence and activities online are recorded or documented. Messages on the Internet can be traced and may exist for a long time, which can make the harm greater, but they can also make it easier to prosecute or sue for Internet misconduct. Often, emotions run high, and things can get out of hand. Sometimes the victim of the misconduct tries to obtain a civil protection order, which opens the door to further criminal prosecution. Whether you are suing for Internet misconduct or defending against criminal charges, the Seattle civil protection order lawyers at Blair Kim Moeller, PLLC may be able to help you.
Understanding the Process of Prosecuting or Suing for Internet Misconduct
It may be possible for online harassment to become the subject of a criminal prosecution, a civil lawsuit, or a civil protection order. In some cases, a civil protection order fails to stop the harassment, and new criminal charges may be brought.
Getting a protection order in place can make any future cyber-harassment or cyberstalking subject to greater penalties. Harassing messages sometimes rise to a level at which you can sue a harasser or abuser in civil court. A victim may also have a claim for defamation or libel in connection with Internet misconduct, if the harassing messages were sent to third parties. The burden of proof in civil cases is lower than it is in criminal cases. Proof must be made by a preponderance of the evidence, which simply means that something is more likely than not. In contrast, a criminal case must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. In a civil lawsuit, the remedy is money damages and possibly an injunction.
In Washington, a prosecutor can establish harassment under 9a.46.020 if they can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that: (1) the defendant, without lawful authority, (2) knowingly threatened (3) to injure someone, to injure their property, to subject the threatened person to restraint or confinement, or to maliciously perform an act intended to substantially hurt the threatened person. Usually, this is a gross misdemeanor, but it can become a class C felony if there is a threat to kill or a prior criminal conviction for harassment of the same person, or if the harassment is in retaliation for the performance of a public servant’s job duties or testimony as a witness.
Harassment can take place online. Generally, the harassing messages must be of a nature such that a reasonable person would experience substantial distress, and the purported victim must actually suffer emotional distress. If the concern is cyberbullying of a child through online harassment, the court will determine whether a reasonable parent would be afraid for their child’s wellbeing.
There may be civil remedies for Internet harassment as well. A person who is being harassed online may be able to retain an attorney to seek an anti-harassment order, one type of civil protection order. Harassment for the purposes of a protective order is a series of acts that seriously harass, annoy, or alarm someone without serving a legitimate purpose and are such that they would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress.
Cyberstalking
Cyberstalking addresses and criminalizes Internet misconduct in a specific, separate statute. A prosecutor can establish cyberstalking if he can prove that the defendant intended to harass, torment, embarrass, or intimidate another person, and under circumstances not considered telephone harassment, electronically communicated to someone or a third party obscene words or images, suggested the commission of a lewd or lascivious act, anonymously contacted the person, or threatened to injure the person or property of the person or a family member of the person being contacted. For example, if someone begins emailing you with threats to kill you via email and sends sexual memes to you via social media, this may be charged as cyberstalking.
Stay In The Know
-
Is It Still a Protection Order Violation if Someone Else Makes the Call?
Attorney reviewed by Mark Blair, a Washington-admitted attorney who handles the firm's criminal defense matters. Last ...
- Protection Order Violations
Read Post -
Coercive Control and Protection Orders in Washington: What Asbach v. Couto Means for DVPO Petitioners
Not every form of domestic violence leaves a bruise. Washington law has recognized this for several years, and a recent ...
- Protection Order Violations
Read Post -
Washington Court Affirms Domestic Violence Protection Order: No Intent Requirement, No Detailed Findings Needed
Domestic violence protection orders can reshape every aspect of a family’s life—restricting contact with a spouse, ...
- Domestic Violence
- Protection Order Violations
Read Post
Real Stories From People We’ve Helped Protect
-
“They showed their best at all times. I would recommend and refer this firm to anyone seeking true professional legal assistance.”- Former Client
-
“If I could give Mark a higher recommendation, then I would. He deserves not 5, but 6 stars for the way he handled my case.”- Scott
-
“I was very pleased with Mark, they responded every time I had any concerns, kept me informed throughout the whole process.”- Alex
